Introduction
The
Coolpix P610 is my first SLR-like (bridge) camera. Over the years I
have moved from medium format twin-reflex film cameras, to SLRs, and
was one of the early adopters of DSLR technology. In between I have
used compacts to digiscope and presently own a Mirrorless Micro Four
Thirds camera.
My current passion is to shoot candid portraits and birds, and my DSLR and Mirrorless meet my photographic needs thanks to the assortment of lenses that I have acquired over time. So a bridge camera that only shoots JPEGs in SRGB on a small sensor made little sense from an image quality perspective.
My current passion is to shoot candid portraits and birds, and my DSLR and Mirrorless meet my photographic needs thanks to the assortment of lenses that I have acquired over time. So a bridge camera that only shoots JPEGs in SRGB on a small sensor made little sense from an image quality perspective.
The
reason I got interested in these cameras had nothing to do with the
potential image quality. Over the last few years I have been
travelling across the country, trying to help beginners make better
bird images. While I do cover the pros and cons of using a Superzoom
compact at these workshops, the content is limited because I had no
hands on experience with one. But a great majority of the audience
actually use these cameras, and DSLR shooting techniques are often of
little interest to them. Additionally, a large number of participants
with compact cameras feel that their equipment is to blame for the
quality of their images, and believe that they will shoot National
Geographic standard images once they are able to make the move to the
next level. I wanted to test this belief and bridge my knowledge
gap with an affordable Superzoom Camera.
Why the Coolpix P610?
The
trigger to start looking for a one was the launch of Nikon's Coolpix
P900 – a bridge camera that sports a mind-boggling 83x zoom and
covers an optical range from 24mm to 2000mm (in 35mm terms). A 2000mm
stabilized lens at less than USD600 is an unbelievable package for a
bird photographer looking for reach. And it would be manna from
heaven if the quality of the images were at least presentable on
social media!
I
spent a lot of time on the internet reading up on the P900. While
doing so I became aware of its smaller sibling – the P610, as also
Canon's venerable Powershot SX50 HS and its upgraded version in the
SX60 HS. I also visited the local store to get a feel of the Nikons.
At
the end I settled for the P610 mainly because:
a) I wanted a lightweight camera which would be easy to carry and also give good results when shooting handheld.
a) I wanted a lightweight camera which would be easy to carry and also give good results when shooting handheld.
b)
Price. Having no experience with these cameras, I wanted to limit the
downside in case I did not get along with it. The P610 was available
at a very decent price of around USD300.
c)
I liked the sample image quality on the internet and was influenced
by the fact that the P610 had won the 2015 TIPA award for the 'Best
Superzoom Camera'.
c)
The P610 focuses significantly closer than the P900 at full zoom. For
my kind of photography that ability was very important.
d)
The Canon SX60 HS seemed like a terrific camera but was too
expensive. The SX50 was not locally available, and in any case
offered 20% less reach than the P610. But the Canons offered RAW
capture – an important advantage for many users.
Giving up on the hugely popular P900 and its 2000mm reach was a difficult decision, but one I took after careful deliberation. The P610 suits my needs, the very similar P900 may be your cup of tea. Have a look at the detailed comparison between the two cameras in the included graphics at the end of this review to help you make up your mind.
Description
Coming
down to the brass tacks about the Coolpix P610, it is described by
Nikon as a digital camera with ultra-powerful 60x optical zoom lens,
high-end grip-style design, GPS, built-in Wi-Fi and Near Field
Communication technology, plus Full HD video capabilities. Nikon's
stress, therefore, is on reach, ergonomics, and cutting edge
technology.
At a more mundane level, the key features are:
Max resolution: 4608 x 3456 ((pixels) / Effective pixels: 16 megapixels
At a more mundane level, the key features are:
Max resolution: 4608 x 3456 ((pixels) / Effective pixels: 16 megapixels
Sensor
type/size: BSI-CMOS 1/2.3"
Shooting
modes: PASM
Autofocus:
Contrast-detect
Image
stabilization: 5-stop Dual Detect Optical VR
ISO
Sensitivity: 100-1600, 3200, 6400
Focal
length (equiv.): 24–1440 mm
Lens
f/-number: f/3.3 - F6.5
Shutter
speed: 1/4000 - 15 sec
Continuous
drive: 7.0 fps for up to 7 shots
Self-timer: 10 or 2 seconds duration
Self-timer: 10 or 2 seconds duration
Videography:
Full HD1920x1080/ 60p / MPEG-4, H.264
Storage
types: SD/SDHC/SDXC
Other
features: Built-in GPS; Wi-Fi
Functionality, HDMI; NFC; Articulated 3” LCD: Electronic
Viewfinder.
Weight:
565g; Dimensions:125 x 85 x 106.5mm
Evaluation
I
have now had the Coolpix P610 for about a month and shot almost a
1000 images with it. That does not make me an expert with the camera, nor does it mean that I have enough experience to write an in-depth
quality review about it. I am, however, fairly long in the tooth as
far as capturing bird images with DSLR's and telephoto lenses are concerned, and that perhaps gives me the ability to evaluate this camera
as a bird photography tool from the perspective of an average user.
In
the hand, this Nikon is a well balanced and light camera with an
excellent grip, making it comfortable to hold. It is an ideal all day
companion. The camera offers full manual controls but the lack of
space results in tiny buttons, dials and wheels – all of which make
setting changes on the fly a tough task. I found it the easiest to
use when the setting choices are pre-selected based on available
conditions. You can make minor changes like ISO level or exposure
compensation, but not with the ease of a DSLR. This Coolpix offers
two viewing modes – the excellent fully articulated LCD screen and
a nice clear 921k-dot EVF. For bird images the EVF is the obvious
choice and it does a good job as long as the subject is more or less
stationary. A plethora of bells and whistles provides focusing,
tracking and metering choices – and you will find one that meets
your photographic needs. For most of the birds that I have
shot, I was happy with the results when I used centre-weighted
metering and single point AF using a 'Normal' sized Manual Focus
point. The camera seems to have a propensity to shift the focus area
slightly after the shutter is pressed. It could be due to the VR or
operator error – either way it is a minor quibble. Shutter speeds
are acceptable for this type of camera, less so the momentary
blanking out of the screen as the image is being recorded. Focusing
is fast and very dependable. I was able to focus on small birds
partially hidden behind dark foliage at the long end of the zoom.
That is perfect for those who wish to acquire this camera to document
or identify their birds. In short, the Coolpix P610 is a perfectly
capable tool to accurately capture near and distant slow moving
subjects with ease by trading ease of control for portability.
Image quality
But
what sort of images does this camera produce? That understandably is
a mixed bag. The small sensor size that allows the matching of
portable lenses with such reach leads to making inevitable
compromises on image quality. Packing 16 megapixels is a 1/2.3”
sensor results in a plethora of quality issues, sensor noise being on
top of the heap. One way to deal with the noise is to allow
photographers to control the effects during post-processing. Some
companies (read Canon and Panasonic) give you that choice by offering
RAW capture options. Nikon's way with these cameras is to control
noise in-camera. This it does at all ISO's and all settings. And the
result is images with unsightly smeared blotchy patches smoothing out
subject detail, read feather details for birds! The happy fact, that
still makes the camera useful, is that there is method in the madness
of noise removal. The removal is particularly aggressive for
out-of-focus distant subjects, and acceptable at low ISO on well
focused frame-filling subjects. This makes the camera fairly hopeless
for those looking to use the wide end for detailed landscape
photography, but its long zoom comes to the aid of those who want to
capture a well focused subject in detail. And a smeared background
may not give you the perfect bokeh, but it moderates another weakness
of the camera – the lack of shallow depth-of-field at all
apertures. However, even though compact cameras can capture RAW
files, their sensors tend to generate a lot of noise at higher ISO
settings which makes extracting fine details well nigh impossible. So
you may not be that much better off with Superzooms that offer RAW
capture when it comes to final output.
Which
brings us to the million dollar question, why buy a camera that does
not give you crisp details across focal lengths and usable ISOs ?
The answer is the quality of the optics, and what you can achieve as
an end result thanks to the glass.
Consumer
zooms are usually far behind professional primes in resolving detail
and making eye-capturing images. It would not have been a surprise if
the P610 offered middling resolution at the price point, especially
considering that even semi-pro zooms suffer at the long end. But here
is where I found that Nikon had pulled off a near miracle with the
camera. This glass is very good and captures fine details even at the
farthest end of the zoom. Coupled with an astonishingly efficient
Vibration Reduction image stabilization system, quality focus, and
accurate metering, the lens delivers sharp images with very little
drop-off in corner clarity making you nearly ignore the overzealous
noise reduction. Photography is all about capturing light accurately
and effectively and the main driver for this is glass quality. You
can have the best processing unit inside the camera, but it will be
worthless if the glass in front is sub par. To my mind Nikon produces
a winner with the Coolpix P610 because of the quality of the optics
which more than compensates for the handicaps inevitable with a mass
produced and aggressively priced camera.
But
this is just my own opinion, you can make yours based on the
accompanying images.
Image samples
Unless
otherwise stated, all images are shot hand-held on Aperture priority
using Centre-weighted metering. Post-processing has been done with
Adobe PS. Some of the images are slightly cropped from the original. Focal lengths are 35mm equivalents.
In good light and with close subjects, the camera takes very useful bird images
In good light and with close subjects, the camera takes very useful bird images
![]() |
1440mm I1/400s I ISO100 I f/6.5 I -0.3EV |
You can make fine close-ups of larger birds too!
The lens gives great results at shorter focal lengths...
... and distant backgrounds are fairly well handled for a sensor of this size
As you can see here also
But where this camera steals the show is the magical image stabilization. This is near impossible at 1/25s handheld with anything else.
Birds in flight were very tough, and I had many misses before managing a few shots. This image also shows the quality at ISO 400
Video capture is a snap and I captured a few minutes, handheld, of this Oriental Skylark singing
The link to the video is here: https://youtu.be/VtIKpFt88Z4
The lens resolves details very well and even managed to capture the bee in flight
It also does street candids with ease
Even from a fair distance
I have little experience with macros, so I leave the images to speak for themselves.
No Superzoom review is complete without a mandatory moon shot, so here is one!
I had poor experience when pixel-peeping landscapes, they don't look so hopeless when downsized
But you do not want to buy this camera for landscapes, you want it for what it can show 160 meters away!
The big debate is always about the superiority of DSLR's and quality primes. While there is no issue about the image quality differences, they do become less evident when the big zoom of the P610 comes into play
The next image compares a DSLR with the P610, with both covering the same image perspective
The DSLR image is, overall, arguably better when both images are downsized. The difference that the P610 makes is evident when you see the 100% crops below. Both images are shot from the same spot.
And I really loved the 'Time Lapse' feature. You can watch an example here: https://youtu.be/ElG2cO-sxZo
![]() |
1440mm I 1/1600s I ISO100 I f/6.5 I -0.3EV |
The lens gives great results at shorter focal lengths...
![]() |
650mm I 1/80s I ISO100 I f/5.6 |
... and distant backgrounds are fairly well handled for a sensor of this size
![]() |
900mm I 1/320s I ISO100 I f/5.6 |
As you can see here also
![]() |
1440mm I 1/125s I ISO100 I f/6.5 |
But where this camera steals the show is the magical image stabilization. This is near impossible at 1/25s handheld with anything else.
![]() |
600mm I 1/25s I ISO100 I f/5.6 |
Birds in flight were very tough, and I had many misses before managing a few shots. This image also shows the quality at ISO 400
![]() |
450mm I 1/640s IISO400 I f/5.6 I +1.0EV |
Video capture is a snap and I captured a few minutes, handheld, of this Oriental Skylark singing
![]() |
900mm I 1/640s I ISO100 I f/5.6 I -0.3EV |
The link to the video is here: https://youtu.be/VtIKpFt88Z4
The lens resolves details very well and even managed to capture the bee in flight
![]() |
1100mm I 1/800s I ISO100 I f/5.6 |
It also does street candids with ease
![]() |
Converted from colour capture. 625mm I 1/100s I ISO 100 I f/6.3 I --0.3EV |
Even from a fair distance
![]() |
Monochrome capture. 1440mm I 1/50s I ISO 100 I f/6.5 |
I have little experience with macros, so I leave the images to speak for themselves.
![]() |
40mm I 1/13s I ISO 100 I f/6.7 I VR off |
![]() |
62mm I 1/13s I ISO 100 I f/7.6 |
No Superzoom review is complete without a mandatory moon shot, so here is one!
![]() |
1440mm I 1/100s I ISO 200 I f/6.5 I -0.3EV I VR off |
I had poor experience when pixel-peeping landscapes, they don't look so hopeless when downsized
![]() |
24mm I 1/400s I ISO100 I f/7.6 |
But you do not want to buy this camera for landscapes, you want it for what it can show 160 meters away!
![]() |
1440mm I 1/400s I ISO 100 I f/6.5 |
The big debate is always about the superiority of DSLR's and quality primes. While there is no issue about the image quality differences, they do become less evident when the big zoom of the P610 comes into play
The next image compares a DSLR with the P610, with both covering the same image perspective
![]() |
(L) P610: 500mm I 1/250s I ISO 100 I f/5.6 (R) D7100 and 300f/4D: 450mm I 1/640s I ISO 100 I f/4 |
The DSLR image is, overall, arguably better when both images are downsized. The difference that the P610 makes is evident when you see the 100% crops below. Both images are shot from the same spot.
![]() |
(L) P610: 1440mm I 1/250s I ISO 100 I f/6.5 (R) D7100 and 300f/4D: 450mm I 1/640s I ISO 100 I f/4 |
And I really loved the 'Time Lapse' feature. You can watch an example here: https://youtu.be/ElG2cO-sxZo
Nikon Coolpix P610 Pros & Cons
Pros:
Quality
lens - good at resolving detail
Fast
and accurate auto focus
Accurate
White Balance selection at Auto WB
Class
leading Vibration Reduction system
Light
and comfortable despite the huge zoom
Works
well at full optical zoom
Inbuilt
GPS with logging function
Good
for wildlife, candids, moon and macros
Cons:
Only
captures sRGB JPEGs, no RAW capture
Fairly
strong in-camera JPEG smudging
Image
quality suffers beyond ISO 400
Focusing
on fast moving subjects is very difficult
Lacks
shallow depth-of-field at all apertures
Not
as convenient as a Point and Shoot camera
Adjusting
settings is cumbersome and time consuming
Battery
can only be charged inside the camera
Subject
disappears after shutter is clicked
Poor
for landscape photography
Conclusion and Verdict
The
Nikon Coolpix P610 is a very useful tool for bird watchers who also
want to record their sightings. Its long reach, simplicity,
portability and ability to make pleasing images makes it a no-brainer
for a full day of birding. The camera is also not a slouch as a
companion for your specialized long lens DSLR kit. It provides
flexibility over superior image quality and is a Swiss Knife of a camera
which sometimes produces results comparable to much more expensive kits. The 1cm minimum wide-angle macro focusing ability provides
great close-up photography opportunities and the unobtrusive size and
long reach makes street-candid photography a cinch. And goodies such
as built-in GPS, slow motion video, interval timer and “Bird Mode'
add more value to an already good camera.
In
the end it is all about your intended use. If you are one of those
that want every image to be of superior print-worthy quality, then
this is not the camera for you. If, however, you are happy to capture
images that are fun to make, meet the resolution needs of social
network sharing, give you something to refer to or document, and is
affordable, then you can't go wrong with the decision to buy this
camera - especially if you like shooting small distant objects.
Or
maybe you are like me and relish the challenge to get the most out of
a good bargain and expose the myth that price is the only determinant
of quality. So go ahead and make that winning image despite, and not
because of the camera you use. This is the perfect camera for that
test of your photography skills!
Happy
shooting!
Bonus!
It was nice to see your review on this camera. Thanks a lot for taking the pain to create this article. I just loved it.
ReplyDeleteMany thanks Anantha. Glad you liked it :)
DeleteExcellent write up Sumit. This puts many a so called professional review to shame. Looks to be excellent vfm and I think the choice of reduced weight against the increased reach is the way to go
ReplyDeleteThank you very much, agree with your conclusion.
DeleteExcellent write up Sumit. This puts many a so called professional review to shame. Looks to be excellent vfm and I think the choice of reduced weight against the increased reach is the way to go
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteSorry about the duplicate posts Sumit, haven't a clue what happened - (Stoupaduck=John Wade)
ReplyDeleteNo issues John. The software must be at fault. A quick Google Search had earlier revealed the identity behind Stoupaduck :)
ReplyDeleteNikon Coolpix P610. Bella camara
ReplyDeleteIt is :)
DeleteThanks a lot Mr. Sumit Sen, your overall review is so good and will help me to consider this camera while opt out for shopping.
ReplyDeleteThank you.
DeleteThanks a lot sumit for writing such a detailed and true review of P610, i ordered this camera today and had lots of questions in mind but i got answers of almost all of them, thx again for this brilliant review.
ReplyDeleteThanks a lot Abhishek. Glad you found it useful :)
DeleteSumit can you please tell me or dir
ReplyDeleteSumit please tell me what post processimg u done on adobe ps to make the photos
ReplyDeleteStandard curves, contrast, vibrance and sharpening.
DeleteI recently purchased this camera after reading this post. Only problem I am facing in manual focusing while trying to capture some candid ...
ReplyDeleteI have never used mine in manual, so don't have any feedback. But thanks for letting me know. I will give manual a spin and update the review.
DeleteIt's an outstanding P610 review, accompanied by beautiful and useful samples, I think the best I've ever read! Thank you very much! Using the DPR New studio scene comparison tool, I remarked the images of P900 were constantly better than those of P610; how relevant would that fact be?
ReplyDeleteHappy shooting,
Augustin
Thanks a bunch Augustin. I have no way to tell as I only used a P900 very briefly. I don't own one.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteI have never seen like this post anywhere. I really appreciate you and just asking one question to you that is I want to purchase a camera and visit a website http://www.trdelectronics.co.uk. Al last i decided to buy Nikon D5300 in only 385. Is it my good decision or not?
ReplyDeleteCan I ask how long the screen blanks out when the shutter is clicked?
ReplyDeleteI have not measured it, but it is noticeable.
DeleteNikon Coolpix P610 VS nikon D500 ??? ^^
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteP610 perfectly works 52mm filters, tested on my P610 :)
ReplyDeleteSensationally takes pictures of the colors are vibrant as in real life.
ReplyDeleteI am impressed by the image quality.
Thank you :)
ReplyDeleteMajorly all singer event all camera shoot man use aluminium scaffolding for perfect shoot.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your sharing.
ReplyDeletehttps://dantri.com.vn/tu-van/kham-ngoai-gio-tai-phong-kham-da-khoa-hong-phong-20181008161331229.htm
https://thanhnien.vn/ban-can-biet/phong-kham-da-khoa-hong-phong-co-tot-khong-897222.html
http://giadinh.net.vn/song-khoe/chat-luong-phong-kham-gan-hong-phong-2018060518371601.htm